Journal list menu

Volume 114, Issue 2 p. 1311-1323
ARTICLE

Does winter cereal rye seeding rate, termination time, and N rate impact no-till soybean?

Heidi K. Reed

Corresponding Author

Heidi K. Reed

Dep. of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State Univ., 116 Agricultural Sciences and Industries Building, Univ. Park, PA, 16802 USA

Correspondence

Heidi K. Reed, Dep. of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State Univ., 116 Agricultural Sciences and Industries Building, Univ. Park, PA 16802, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, ​Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Heather D. Karsten

Heather D. Karsten

Dep. of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State Univ., 116 Agricultural Sciences and Industries Building, Univ. Park, PA, 16802 USA

Contribution: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 February 2022
Citations: 7

Assigned to Associate Editor Bijesh Maharjan.

Abstract

Some farmers who use cover crops (CCs) have moved from CC preplant kill (PK) to delayed CC termination, called planting green (PG). We conducted a study to explore if soil conditions and crop production can be optimized by manipulating winter cereal rye (Secale cereal L.) seeding rate and spring N topdress rate for these two termination times. Treatments were arranged in a split-split plot, randomized complete block design with four replications for three years at two Pennsylvania locations. Main plots were seeding rate (34, 67, and 134 kg ha−1, or 1x, 2x, and 4x, respectively), subplots were termination timing (PK and PG), and sub-subplots were N rate (34 and 67 kg ha−1, or low and high, respectively). Planting green nearly doubled rye biomass at both sites, and at Landisville the high N rate accumulated 17% more biomass than the low N rate, while there was no biomass N rate effect in PK. Soil in PG was 7–15% drier at planting, up to 7% wetter later, and up to 0.9–1.3 °C cooler compared with PK at both sites. Soybean (Glycine max L.) yield was reduced by 3–4% when PG was paired with the high N rate across seeding rates at Rock Springs and with the 1x seeding rate at Landisville compared with other treatment combinations. Soybean population was not impacted by treatments. We conclude rye seeding and N topdress rates of 34 kg ha−1 in PG can maintain similar conditions and soybean yield equivalent to PK, thereby reducing seed and N costs.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.