Journal list menu

Volume 63, Issue 2 p. 495-500
SCIENTIFIC PERSPECTIVES

Stocking method and terminology in grazing management: Evaluation of assertions from educational, outreach, and engagement programs

Miguel S. Castillo

Corresponding Author

Miguel S. Castillo

Crop and Soil Sciences Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

Correspondence

Miguel S. Castillo, Crop and Soil Sciences Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Marcelo Wallau

Marcelo Wallau

Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 November 2022
Citations: 4

Assigned to Associate Editor Carlos Pedreira.

Abstract

We revisited terminology and assertions about grazing management in general, but more specifically the choice of the stocking method, and considered their merit in the context of evidence from the literature, including a chapter entitled Prescribed Grazing on Pasturelands from a National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) literature synthesis published in 2012 (Nelson, 2012). We framed those assertions in the form of questions. Our objectives were to consider whether these often-stated assertions about grazing management were supported, refuted, or simply not adequately assessed by the body of scientific evidence and to help focus future discussion about the topic.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.