Journal list menu

Volume 52, Issue 3 p. 465-475
SPECIAL SECTION: EXPLORING THE SOIL HEALTH–WATERSHED HEALTH NEXUS

Scaling up conservation agriculture: An exploration of challenges and opportunities through a stakeholder engagement process

A. Reimer

Corresponding Author

A. Reimer

National Wildlife Federation, 203 W. Liberty St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48104 USA

Correspondence

A. Reimer, National Wildlife Federation, 203 W. Liberty St., Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, ​Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
J. E. Doll

J. E. Doll

W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State Univ., 3700 Gull Lake Dr., Hickory Corners, MI, 49060 USA

Current address: Michigan Agriculture Advancement, 4420 Parman Rd, Stockbridge, MI, 49285 USA

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, ​Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
T. J. Boring

T. J. Boring

Michigan Agriculture Advancement, 4420 Parman Rd, Stockbridge, MI, 49285 USA

Current address: USDA Farm Service Agency, 3001 Coolidge Rd., Suite 350, East Lansing, MI, 48823 USA

Contribution: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, ​Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
T. Zimnicki

T. Zimnicki

Groundwater, Surface Water, and Agriculture, Michigan Environmental Council, 602 W. Ionia St., Lansing, MI, 48933 USA

Current address: Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, 525 W. Allegan St., Lansing, MI, 48933 USA

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, ​Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 December 2021
Citations: 3

Assigned to Associate Editor Ray Anderson.

Abstract

Increasing the resilience of agricultural landscapes requires fundamental changes to the dominant commodity production model, including incorporating practices such as reduced tillage, cover cropping, and extended rotations that reduce soil disturbance while increasing biological diversity. Increasing farmer adoption of these conservation systems offers the potential to transform agriculture to a more vibrant, resilient system that protects soil, air, and water quality. Adoption of these resilience practices is not without significant challenges. This paper presents findings from a participatory effort to better understand these challenges and to develop solutions to help producers overcome them. Through repeated, facilitated discussions with farmers and agricultural and conservation professionals across the U.S. state of Michigan, we confronted the policy, economic, and structural barriers that are inhibiting broader adoption of conservation systems, as well as identified policies, programs, and markets that can support their adoption. What emerged was a complex picture and dynamic set of challenges at multiple spatial scales and across multiple domains. The primary themes emerging from these discussions were barriers and opportunities, including markets, social networks, human capital, and conservation programs. Exacerbating the technical, agronomic, and economic challenges farmers face at the farm level, there are a host of community constraints, market access and availability problems, climatic and environmental changes, and policies (governmental and corporate) that cross-pressure farmers when it comes to making conservation decisions. Understanding these constraints is critical to developing programs, policies, and state and national investments that can drive adoption of conservation agriculture.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.