Journal list menu

Volume 33, Issue 1 p. 7-12
Agricultural Pesticide

Reducing Atrazine Losses

Water Quality Implications of Alternative Runoff Control Practices

Wyatte L. Harman

Corresponding Author

Wyatte L. Harman

Blackland Research and Extension Center, 720 East Blackland Road, Temple, TX, 76502

Corresponding author ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
E. Wang

E. Wang

Department of Agribusiness, Tarleton State University, Box T-0050, Stephenville, TX, 76402

Search for more papers by this author
J. R. Williams

J. R. Williams

Blackland Research and Extension Center, 720 East Blackland Road, Temple, TX, 76502

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 January 2004
Citations: 5

ABSTRACT

Water quality is being affected by herbicides, some allegedly harmful to human health. Under scrutiny is atrazine (1-chloro-3-ethylamino-5-isopropylamino-2,4,6-triazine), a commonly used herbicide in corn (Zea mays L.) and sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production. Concentrations of soluble and adsorbed atrazine losses sometimes exceed the safe drinking water standard of 3 μg L−1 established by the USEPA. This study assesses the protective implications of runoff control structures and alternative crop farming practices to minimize atrazine losses. Using a computerized simulation model, APEX, the following four practices were the most effective with respect to the average atrazine loss as a percent of the amount applied: (i) constructing sediment ponds, 0.09%; (ii) establishing grass filter strips, 0.14%; (iii) banding a 25% rate of atrazine, 0.40%; and (iv) constructing wetlands, 0.45%. Other atrazine runoff management options, including adoption of alternative tillage practices such as conservation and no-till as well as splitting applications between fall and spring, were marginally effective.