Journal list menu

Volume 38, Issue 5 p. 1968-1980
Special Submission

Approaches for Quantifying and Managing Diffuse Phosphorus Exports at the Farm/Small Catchment Scale

Richard W. McDowell

Corresponding Author

Richard W. McDowell

AgResearch Limited, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand

Corresponding author ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
David Nash

David Nash

Victorian Dep. of Primary Industries–Ellinbank, RMB 2460 Hazeldean Rd., Ellinbank, Victoria, 3821 Australia

e-Water CRC, Univ. of Canberra, GPO, Canberra, ACT, 2601 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Anja George

Anja George

Victorian Dep. of Primary Industries–Ellinbank, RMB 2460 Hazeldean Rd., Ellinbank, Victoria, 3821 Australia

e-Water CRC, Univ. of Canberra, GPO, Canberra, ACT, 2601 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Q. J. Wang

Q. J. Wang

CSIRO Land and Water, P.O. Box 56 Highett, Highett, Victoria, 3190 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ruth Duncan

Ruth Duncan

Brolgas-Environmental, P.O. Box 1315, Kununurra, Western Australia, 6743 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 September 2009
Citations: 30

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Abstract

Quantifying and managing diffuse P losses from small catchments or at the farm scale requires detailed knowledge of farming practices and their interaction with catchment processes. However, detailed knowledge may not be available and hence modeling is required. This paper demonstrates two approaches to developing tools that assist P losses from New Zealand or Australian dairy farms. The first is largely empirical and separates sources of P within a paddock into soil, fertilizer, dung, and treading impacts (including damage to grazed pasture). This information is combined with expert knowledge of hydrological processes and potential point sources (e.g., stream crossings) to create a deterministic model that can be used to evaluate the most cost and labor efficient method of mitigating P losses. For instance, in one example, 45% of annual P lost was attributed to the application of superphosphate just before a runoff event for which a mitigation strategy could be to use a less water soluble P fertilizer. The second approach uses a combination of interviews, expert knowledge and relationships to develop a Bayesian Network that describes P exports. The knowledge integration process helped stakeholders develop a comprehensive understanding of the problem. The Network, presented in the form of a “cause and effect”, diagram provided a simple, visual representation of current knowledge that could be easily applied to individual circumstances and isolate factors having the greatest influence on P loss. Both approaches demonstrate that modeling P losses and mitigation strategies does not have to cover every process or permutation and that a degree of uncertainty can be handled to create a working model of P losses at a farm or small catchment scale.