Journal list menu

Volume 39, Issue 5 p. 1657-1667
Landscape and Watershed Process

Sources of Nitrate Yields in the Mississippi River Basin

Mark B. David

Corresponding Author

Mark B. David

Univ. of Illinois, Dep. of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, W-503 Turner Hall, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801

Corresponding author ([email protected])Search for more papers by this author
Laurie E. Drinkwater

Laurie E. Drinkwater

Cornell Univ., Dep. of Horticulture, Ithaca, NY, 14853

Assigned to Associate Editor Sue NewmanSearch for more papers by this author
Gregory F. McIsaac

Gregory F. McIsaac

Univ. of Illinois, Dep. of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, W-503 Turner Hall, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 September 2010
Citations: 333

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Abstract

Riverine nitrate N in the Mississippi River leads to hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Several recent modeling studies estimated major N inputs and suggested source areas that could be targeted for conservation programs. We conducted a similar analysis with more recent and extensive data that demonstrates the importance of hydrology in controlling the percentage of net N inputs (NNI) exported by rivers. The average fraction of annual riverine nitrate N export/NNI ranged from 0.05 for the lower Mississippi subbasin to 0.3 for the upper Mississippi River basin and as high as 1.4 (4.2 in a wet year) for the Embarras River watershed, a mostly tile-drained basin. Intensive corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] watersheds on Mollisols had low NNI values and when combined with riverine N losses suggest a net depletion of soil organic N. We used county-level data to develop a nonlinear model of N inputs and landscape factors that were related to winter–spring riverine nitrate yields for 153 watersheds within the basin. We found that river runoff times fertilizer N input was the major predictive term, explaining 76% of the variation in the model. Fertilizer inputs were highly correlated with fraction of land area in row crops. Tile drainage explained 17% of the spatial variation in winter–spring nitrate yield, whereas human consumption of N (i.e., sewage effluent) accounted for 7%. Net N inputs were not a good predictor of riverine nitrate N yields, nor were other N balances. We used this model to predict the expected nitrate N yield from each county in the Mississippi River basin; the greatest nitrate N yields corresponded to the highly productive, tile-drained cornbelt from southwest Minnesota across Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio. This analysis can be used to guide decisions about where efforts to reduce nitrate N losses can be most effectively targeted to improve local water quality and reduce export to the Gulf of Mexico.