Journal list menu

Volume 56, Issue 5
Research

What Should Students in Plant Breeding Know About the Statistical Aspects of Genotype × Environment Interactions?

Fred A. van Eeuwijk

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: fred.vaneeuwijk@wur.nl

Biometris, Wageningen Univ., PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Corresponding author (E-mail address: fred.vaneeuwijk@wur.nl).Search for more papers by this author
Daniela V. Bustos‐Korts

Biometris, Wageningen Univ., PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Marcos Malosetti

Biometris, Wageningen Univ., PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 September 2016
Citations: 10

All rights reserved.

Assigned to Associate Editor Jean‐Luc Jannink.

Abstract

A good statistical analysis of genotype × environment interactions (G × E) is a key requirement for progress in any breeding program. Data for G × E analyses traditionally come from multi‐environment trials. In recent years, increasingly data are generated from managed stress trials, phenotyping platforms, and high throughput phenotyping techniques in the field. Simultaneously, and complementary to the phenotyping, more elaborate genotyping and envirotyping occur. All of these developments further increase the importance of a sound statistical framework for analyzing G × E. This paper presents considerations on such a framework from the point of view of the choices that need to be made with respect to the content of short academic courses on statistical methods for G × E. Based on our experiences in teaching statistical methods to plant breeders, for specialized G × E courses between three and 5 d are reserved. The audience in such courses includes MSc students, PhD students, postdocs, and researchers at breeding companies. For such specialized courses, we propose a collection of topics to be covered. Our outlook on G × E analyses is two‐fold. On the one hand, we see the G × E problem as the building of predictive models for genotype‐specific reaction norms. On the other hand, the G × E problem consists in the identification of suitable variance‐covariance models to describe heterogeneity of genetic variance and correlations across environments. Our preferred class of statistical models is the class of mixed linear‐bilinear models. These statistical models allow us to answer breeding questions on adaptation, adaptability, stability, and the identification and subdivision of the target population of environments. By a citation analysis of the literature on G × E, we show that our preference for mixed linear‐bilinear models for analyzing G × E is supported by recent trends in the types of methods for G × E analysis that are most frequently cited.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 10

  • Variance component estimations and mega‐environments for sweetpotato breeding in West Africa, Crop Science, 10.1002/csc2.20034, 60, 1, (50-61), (2020).
  • metan: An R package for multi‐environment trial analysis, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10.1111/2041-210X.13384, 11, 6, (783-789), (2020).
  • Cross‐validation of stagewise mixed‐model analysis of Swedish variety trials with winter wheat and spring barley, Crop Science, 10.1002/csc2.20177, 60, 5, (2221-2240), (2020).
  • Boosting predictive ability of tropical maize hybrids via genotype‐by‐environment interaction under multivariate GBLUP models, Crop Science, 10.1002/csc2.20253, 0, 0, (2020).
  • A Cross‐Validation of Statistical Models for Zoned‐Based Prediction in Cultivar Testing, Crop Science, 10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0642, 59, 4, (1544-1553), (2019).
  • Mean Performance and Stability in Multi‐Environment Trials I: Combining Features of AMMI and BLUP Techniques, Agronomy Journal, 10.2134/agronj2019.03.0220, 111, 6, (2949-2960), (2019).
  • Mean Performance and Stability in Multi‐Environment Trials II: Selection Based on Multiple Traits, Agronomy Journal, 10.2134/agronj2019.03.0221, 111, 6, (2961-2969), (2019).
  • Selection of Superior Inbred Progenies toward the Common Bean Ideotype, Agronomy Journal, 10.2134/agronj2018.12.0761, 111, 3, (1181-1189), (2019).
  • Constrained AMMI Model: Application to Polish Winter Wheat Post‐Registration Data, Crop Science, 10.2135/cropsci2017.06.0347, 58, 4, (1458-1469), (2018).
  • Performance of Cowpea Genotypes in the Brazilian Midwest Using the Bayesian Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction Model, Agronomy Journal, 10.2134/agronj2017.03.0183, 110, 1, (147-154), (2018).