What Should Students in Plant Breeding Know About the Statistical Aspects of Genotype × Environment Interactions?
All rights reserved.
Assigned to Associate Editor Jean‐Luc Jannink.
Abstract
A good statistical analysis of genotype × environment interactions (G × E) is a key requirement for progress in any breeding program. Data for G × E analyses traditionally come from multi‐environment trials. In recent years, increasingly data are generated from managed stress trials, phenotyping platforms, and high throughput phenotyping techniques in the field. Simultaneously, and complementary to the phenotyping, more elaborate genotyping and envirotyping occur. All of these developments further increase the importance of a sound statistical framework for analyzing G × E. This paper presents considerations on such a framework from the point of view of the choices that need to be made with respect to the content of short academic courses on statistical methods for G × E. Based on our experiences in teaching statistical methods to plant breeders, for specialized G × E courses between three and 5 d are reserved. The audience in such courses includes MSc students, PhD students, postdocs, and researchers at breeding companies. For such specialized courses, we propose a collection of topics to be covered. Our outlook on G × E analyses is two‐fold. On the one hand, we see the G × E problem as the building of predictive models for genotype‐specific reaction norms. On the other hand, the G × E problem consists in the identification of suitable variance‐covariance models to describe heterogeneity of genetic variance and correlations across environments. Our preferred class of statistical models is the class of mixed linear‐bilinear models. These statistical models allow us to answer breeding questions on adaptation, adaptability, stability, and the identification and subdivision of the target population of environments. By a citation analysis of the literature on G × E, we show that our preference for mixed linear‐bilinear models for analyzing G × E is supported by recent trends in the types of methods for G × E analysis that are most frequently cited.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 10
- Jolien Swanckaert, Daniel Akansake, Kwadwo Adofo, Kwabena Acheremu, Bert De Boeck, Raul Eyzaguirre, Wolfgang J. Grüneberg, Jan W. Low, Hugo Campos, Variance component estimations and mega‐environments for sweetpotato breeding in West Africa, Crop Science, 10.1002/csc2.20034, 60, 1, (50-61), (2020).
- Tiago Olivoto, Alessandro Dal'Col Lúcio, metan: An R package for multi‐environment trial analysis, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10.1111/2041-210X.13384, 11, 6, (783-789), (2020).
- Harimurti Buntaran, Hans‐Peter Piepho, Paul Schmidt, Jesper Rydén, Magnus Halling, Johannes Forkman, Cross‐validation of stagewise mixed‐model analysis of Swedish variety trials with winter wheat and spring barley, Crop Science, 10.1002/csc2.20177, 60, 5, (2221-2240), (2020).
- Matheus Dalsente Krause, Kaio Olímpio das Graças Dias, Jhonathan Pedroso Rigal dos Santos, Amanda Avelar Oliveira, Lauro José Moreira Guimarães, Maria Marta Pastina, Gabriel Rodrigues Alves Margarido, Antonio Augusto Franco Garcia, Boosting predictive ability of tropical maize hybrids via genotype‐by‐environment interaction under multivariate GBLUP models, Crop Science, 10.1002/csc2.20253, 0, 0, (2020).
- Harimurti Buntaran, Hans‐Peter Piepho, Jannie Hagman, Johannes Forkman, A Cross‐Validation of Statistical Models for Zoned‐Based Prediction in Cultivar Testing, Crop Science, 10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0642, 59, 4, (1544-1553), (2019).
- Tiago Olivoto, Alessandro D.C. Lúcio, José A.G. Silva, Volmir S. Marchioro, Velci Q. Souza, Evandro Jost, Mean Performance and Stability in Multi‐Environment Trials I: Combining Features of AMMI and BLUP Techniques, Agronomy Journal, 10.2134/agronj2019.03.0220, 111, 6, (2949-2960), (2019).
- Tiago Olivoto, Alessandro D. C. Lúcio, José A. G. Silva, Bruno G. Sari, Maria I. Diel, Mean Performance and Stability in Multi‐Environment Trials II: Selection Based on Multiple Traits, Agronomy Journal, 10.2134/agronj2019.03.0221, 111, 6, (2961-2969), (2019).
- João Romero do Amaral Santos de Carvalho Rocha, Kharenn Vailant Nunes, Ana Laura Nicomedes Carneiro, Tiago de Souza Marçal, Felipe Vicentino Salvador, Pedro Crescêncio Souza Carneiro, José Eustáquio Souza Carneiro, Selection of Superior Inbred Progenies toward the Common Bean Ideotype, Agronomy Journal, 10.2134/agronj2018.12.0761, 111, 3, (1181-1189), (2019).
- Jakub Paderewski, Paulo C. Rodrigues, Constrained AMMI Model: Application to Polish Winter Wheat Post‐Registration Data, Crop Science, 10.2135/cropsci2017.06.0347, 58, 4, (1458-1469), (2018).
- Luciano Antonio Oliveira, Carlos Pereira Silva, Paulo Eduardo Teodoro, Francisco Eduardo Torres, Agenor Martinho Corrêa, Leonardo Lopes Bhering, Performance of Cowpea Genotypes in the Brazilian Midwest Using the Bayesian Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction Model, Agronomy Journal, 10.2134/agronj2017.03.0183, 110, 1, (147-154), (2018).




